Electric car

I do not have sense for business, and I am sorry for that. But, finally, I understood why power utilities are popularizing electric car usage! Because they will sell You power for electric car, instead of going to gas station(another company) and buying fuel. So, by electric cars, they are taking over customers from fuel companies...Eureka (for me :-)

The need of having strategy in a world with high volatile changes

This question emerged today in my mind.

I've been trying to define, no, not to define, but to try to explain some of my human attributes, and this is how I see myself today, or better say, part of myself, because I am not only that:

1. I am asking wright questions - important
2. I understand to some extent global reality - or better say, trends. I am not so cut from the rest of the world. I realize volatility, change, trying, evolutionary approach, no clear vision - ways used in today's world, which are tried to be used to solve some problems and get some gain or profit.
3. In some less extent I reveal hidden causes, or at least I assume that they must exist.
4. I am observing one phenomenon from multiple angles - one angle, opposite angle and neutral angle, as far as I am capable to.
5. I am aware that any conclusion which I made can not be final conclusion but maybe some hypothesis on which I can rely for some time, until it becomes not-valid, when I need to establish another one.
6. I am trying to distinguish facts from opinions.
7. I recognize multi-variability of some phenomenon, although I am not able to say which are all variables, and how they are influencing the phenomena. 
8. And what surprised me - even in cases of high volatility, uncertainty I recognize the need of having strategy and having strategic answer. This looks contradictory - high volatility vs. strategy - how strategy can function in cases of high uncertainty? I do not know the answer but some presentiment or hunch is telling me that if the uncertainty is growing, also grows the need of having strategic steps which need to be taken. I can not explain why is that, and maybe I am wrong about it.
9. What I am trying to use as a tool is applying models from one context to another. For example, I've been thinking about applying chess model from the chess context to strategic games of global players - one simple example. I still did not do to much on this approach, but I have a sense that this approach can yield very interesting and not expecting results.

Art of creation

After watching some disgusting show, I've asked myself - can any art of creation be called artistic? By looking at the results from that show, my stomach told me - NO, but, what, and who can tell what is artistic and what is not? How true art can be recognized? 

Beskonačne ličnosti

Pošto sam pre par meseci krenuo da radim u Beogradu, vozim se tramvajem, koji je relativno spor i dozvoljava da se uz put svašta vidi. Na stanici na Novom Beogradu, na jednom stubu, je bio zalepljen plakat na kome je pisalo "Srbi za Srbe". Pa sam se upitao - a zašto su se ograničili samo na to, zašto je bitno da Srbi daju\pomažu Srbima, zašto ne Svet za Srbe, Srbi za Svet, Čovek za Čoveka, Čovečansto za Čoveka, Čovek za Čovečanstvo.

Ta ideja mi se poklopila sa više ideja i misli koje su mi se javljale u poslednje vreme, a takođe je, naravno otvorila i neka nova pitanja:

1. ideja o tome da nas definiše ono što znamo i ono što ne znamo iz koje implica potreba za što sveobuhvatnijim obrazovanjem i iskustvom. Manifestacija te ideje se ogleda u tome, da sam ja posmatrajući svoj život, na neki način, video njegovu reaktivnu prirodu, a to je da sam ja reagovao na ona spoljna dešavanja za koja sam imao znanja, kapacitet i emociju da odreagujem i da nisam odreagova na ona za koja nisam imao kapacitet, znanje itd. Tim reagovanjima i nereagovanjima je formirana moja životna putanja.

2. mnogostruka (beskonačna?) čovekova ličnost. O ovoj ideji sam čitao u pravoslavnoj literaturi, gde se priča o bogolikoj ljudskoj prirodi, i da smo mi u stvari nosioci Boga u sebi, i da na taj način, pošto je Bog sve, mi imamo svestranu, mnogostruku, beskonačnu ličnost.

3. pa sam se upitao, kakvi su to ljudi koji pišu Srbi za Srbe, i koja je moguća praktična i idejna granice ljudske identifikacije, pitanje potrebe za identifikacijom(zašto ne možemo da na praktičnom smislu budemo identifikovani sa idejom Boga - da živimo mnogostruku (beskonačnu?) čovekovu ličnost? Koje su praktične granice čovekove ličnosti? Šta se zapravo dobija, (i da li se dobija?) mnogostrukošću tj. širenjem granica čovekove ličnosti? Kako se uopšte meri ta dobit, dobrobit - uživanjem u životu, radošću, smirenošću, zahvalnošću drugih ljudi, nečim drugim? Kako izgleda idejna beskonačnost (identifikacija sa Bogom?) kada čovek ostvari beskonačnost svoje ličnosti - ne verujem da je sa 76 godina prosečnog ljudskog veka ovo moguće, ali kao šta kaže Vladeta Jerotić, oboženje se nastavlja posle smrti. Zašto je čoveku uopšte potrebna ta identifikacija? Šta bi bio čovek bez toga? Kako izgleda čovek koji ne živi i ne dozvoljava svojoj mnogostrukoj ličnosti da se razvije? Da li se i ovde postavlja pitanje mere? Kako uskladiti kvalitet razvoja(plemenitost?) sa kvantitetom - ili svi putevi vode u Rim?

Posle sam još video i ovaj link sa ocem Romilom u gostovanju u emisiji Agape ovde.